Match.com faces lawsuit - Silicon Valley / San Jose Business Journal:

http://robot-it.ru/?rossiiskie_roboty
The lawsuit, which is seeking class-action status, filed against Dallas-based Match.com was filed by Sean McGinhn of Brooklyn, N.Y., on behalf of other Match.com userse or former users impacted bythe company’s allegedc actions. In the suit, the plaintiff accusesx Match.com of keeping the profiles of canceledxmembers online, despite the fact those memberx had suspended their memberships and cannot respond to e-mails from other Match.com users. The suit alleges that the majority of Matcu members are actually canceled subscribers or neve subscribedat all.
Subscribers profiled remain online evenafter they've cancelec their subscription, and that is not made clear in the user according to the suit. “Matchg misleads paying subscribers by charging them for the abilitty towrite e-mails to members who can’ft reply to their e-mails or even read them,” said the which was filed in New York state. Match.con responded to the allegations, releasing a statement saying: "Whil e we only just received the complaint, we believse this lawsuit is without merit, and we will defend it Match.com is the first and one of the largesf global online communities for singles looking to start ameaningfupl relationship.
We stand behine our product 100%.” The plaintifgf in the suit also alleged thatMatch “defraudxs the consumer of his/her time and personal investment everyu time a person pays Match’s subscription fee and writeas to a member who won’t have the ability to read what they wrotew or see their profile.” In the the plaintiff accuses Match of putting users in a positiohn where they feel humiliated by e-mailes that they send without a replh from the unsubscribed members. The plaintiff’ s suit also alleges that he and other clasx members have been defrauded out of millionsin “aggregatedx fees and compensatory damages.
” It claimas Match is benefiting from the who can't reply because the notifications that someone has expresserd interest induces some nonsubscribers to subscribe. The lawsuit alleges deceptivw trade practices, breach of the implied covenany of good faith andfair dealing, fraud and negligen t misrepresentation. It seeks unspecified damages, but notex that it expects damages toexceed $5 McGinn is seeking a jury trial.